Life Science Leader Magazine

JAN 2015

The vision of Life Science Leader is to help facilitate connections and foster collaborations in pharma and med device development to get more life-saving and life-improving therapies to market in an efficient manner. Connect, Collaborate, Contribute

Issue link: https://lifescienceleadermag.epubxp.com/i/437789

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 30 of 53

29 LIFESCIENCELEADER.COM JANUARY 2015 datatrak.com +1.440.443.0082 marketing@datatrak.com SIMPLIFYING your eClinical process ® addition, combinations of immune check- point inhibitors with other mechanisms such as cancer vaccines, cell therapies, and immune-activating antibodies are now being tested in the clinic and will likely be part of the oncologist's armamen- tarium in the future. Backbone therapy? It is probably too early to tell whether one axis will be the backbone of all immu- no-oncology combinations. There will be variability from tumor type to tumor type and even among patients. Already, data suggest that the CTLA-4 and PD-1/ PD-L1 pathways are more relevant for drug therapy in some tumors than oth- ers. Our understanding of therapeutic selection will become more refined as the roles of particular immune checkpoints are better elucidated across a wide range of tumors. Five Prime is developing novel checkpoints that could be used in combi- nation with the clinically validated path- way inhibitors, but may also be used as a single agent in tumors that do not respond well to those therapies. Combo criteria? Selection of specific immuno-oncology combinations will likely be done by char- acterizing immune checkpoint proteins (or the nucleic acid transcripts that code for such proteins) present in a patient's tumor or immune cells. In addition, the safety profile of each drug should be con- sidered before combining them. Narrow or wide applications? Five Prime focuses on more generalizable immuno-oncology approaches that can be given to all patients who are likely to have the relevant target for a drug such as a monoclonal antibody. However, this doesn't mean that we can ignore what the patient's tumor looks like. As patients, physicians, and payers demand better out- comes and probabilities of success, there will be demand for biomarker molecular profiling to select immunotherapies most likely to result in durable responses and improved survival. Personal or broad? Patient cell-based approaches, such as artificial T cells expressing tumor-recog- nizing receptors (also known as chimeric antigen receptor-T cells, or CAR-T cells), are intriguing, and some of the Phase 1 data, particularly in hematologic malig- nancies, have been exciting. The CAR-T cells are reintroduced into the patient and hopefully recognize and kill the can- cer cells. So every patient represents essentially a separate manufacturing lot. Despite encouraging data, significant

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Life Science Leader Magazine - JAN 2015