Life Science Leader Magazine Supplements

CRO Leadership Awards 2013

The vision of Life Science Leader is to be an essential business tool for life science executives. Our content is designed to not only inform readers of best practices, but motivate them to implement those best practices in their own businesses.

Issue link: https://lifescienceleadermag.epubxp.com/i/111709

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 17 of 45

Contract Research Organizations WHAT SPECIFIC ADVICE DO YOU HAVE FOR EXECUTIVES INVOLVED IN THE INSOURCING VERSUS OUTSOURCING DECISION? Burhop: The key to outsourcing preclinical studies is to conduct solid and extensive up-front research on each CRO under consideration for a particular study. Go with the company that genuinely cares about your product development and is willing to work with you as a partner versus just another customer bringing in money. Reputation and scientific expertise, combined with quality and timely output, are key. In the end, much of this is about establishing a relationship with a CRO and, in particular, with the study director assigned to your study. They have to be extensions of your internal team. Consider all of the trade-offs of cost relative to lost time, training of resources, ongoing need for special resources, talent, and ultimately the quality of the work. Hubbard: We are moving into an era where ���transactional��� insourcing of personnel to support projects, or outsourcing of full programs to CROs needs to be part of a more integrated and overall drug development strategy. Fiscal pressure on both sponsors and CROs continues, while the need to improve quality and enhance delivery and competitiveness cause opposing pressures. The solution is to apply a 16 The CRO Leadership Awards 2013 more strategic approach. For example, specific technical, operational, or regional capabilities can be accessed using CROs without building internal infrastructure. This is highly useful when new product is acquired through licensing or via an acquisition, thus maintaining a high degree of flexibility for noncore areas. A more long-term perspective allows organizations to learn and grow together, significantly reducing the cost of sales and overhead within the sponsor organizations, improving staff utilization, and reducing operating expenses overall. It also provides a foundation for joint innovation which can be shared by both organizations. The solution needs to be fully accepted throughout the sponsor and CRO organizations, since it may create constraints on the number of providers to be utilized ��� virtually eliminating the traditional Request for Proposal, RFP, and Request for Information, RFI, processes. Williams: It is vital to determine early on the critical proprietary aspects of the program and build those within your organization. Outsource only noncritical or ���programmed��� aspects of your program. Continually assess/reassess and determine what critical initiatives may need parallel tracks. For additional executive level insights, please check out content at www.clinicalleader.com.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Life Science Leader Magazine Supplements - CRO Leadership Awards 2013